Did the Jews Really Kill Jesus?

Blaming the Jews for Jesus's death is like blaming Italians for inventing Caesar salad – it's ancient history, completely irrelevant, and downright ridiculous. This old trope of "deicide," accusing Jews of "killing God," has been used for centuries to justify bloodshed, pogroms, and persecution. It all stems from people twisting their own sacred texts into weapons of hate. It's the ultimate victim-blaming: a Jewish preacher arrested and executed by Roman authorities, yet the entire Jewish people get saddled with eternal collective guilt, as if they were all responsible.



Let's break down this theological trainwreck with real historical facts, because nothing exposes nonsense quite like the truth. This myth isn't just laughable – it's dangerous, and it still echoes today in various forms, making it a powerful tool for antisemites.

The roots go back to certain passages in the New Testament, like Matthew 27:25, where a crowd says, "His blood be on us and on our children." These verses were twisted to pin blame on all Jews for generations. But honestly, that was a misguided interpretation meant to serve theological and political agendas. Early Christians, eager to distance themselves from Judaism and convert pagans, amped up the accusations to scapegoat Jews. It wasn't based on history, but on the need to forge a separate identity.

Pontius Pilate, the Roman governor, ordered the crucifixion, and Roman soldiers carried it out – not the Jews. Roman law dictated crucifixion for crimes like sedition, which Jesus was accused of due to his messianic claims.

In the Middle Ages, this accusation became central to Christian antisemitism. Easter sermons often railed against "Christ-killers," sparking violent pogroms. Picture crowds whipped into a frenzy by priests, storming out to "avenge" something from centuries earlier. In 1096, during the First Crusade, thousands of Jews were slaughtered in Germany and France under cries of "killers of God." It wasn't random violence – it was organized, rooted in distorted theology.

The Catholic Church held onto this view until the 20th century, leading to ghettos, expulsions, and forced conversions. In Spain in 1391, massive pogroms forced tens of thousands of Jews to convert, with many killed as "Christ-killers."

Finally, in 1965, the Second Vatican Council under Pope Paul VI rejected collective Jewish guilt. In the document Nostra Aetate, the Church officially stated that Jews as a people aren't responsible for Jesus's death and called for interfaith dialogue. But it came too late for millions who suffered over the centuries.

The Holocaust itself drew on this myth – Hitler and the Nazis portrayed Jews as "cursed" and "God-killers." In Mein Kampf, Hitler called Jews "destroyers of nations," tying it straight back to old Christian accusations.

In the modern world, the myth lingers in disguised forms. Among extreme Christian groups, like some evangelical sects, there's still talk of a "Jewish curse" for rejecting Jesus. Online, on forums like 4chan or Reddit, antisemitic trolls use it to fuel hate. Even in politics, echoes appear in claims of Jewish "dual loyalty" – linking back to ideas of betrayal from the deicide myth.



Modern biblical scholars, from places like the Hebrew University or Christian institutions, clarify that Romans were responsible, and New Testament passages are theological rhetoric, not historical reporting.

Let's dig deeper into why this is so absurd. First, Jesus himself was Jewish – born, lived, and died as a Jew. His early followers were Jews, and Christianity grew out of Judaism. Blaming Jews for his death is like blaming a family for a relative's murder – nonsensical.

Second, history shows Romans crucified thousands of Jews for similar offenses; it was standard punishment. There's no evidence outside the New Testament of massive Jewish involvement. Scholars like James Dunn or E.P. Sanders explain the narrative was shaped to shift blame from Romans to ease Christianity's spread in the empire.

The real horror is the impact: millions of Jews murdered, expelled, tortured because of this lie. In 19th-century Poland, pogroms like 1881 were fueled by such sermons. Even today, in parts of Latin America or Africa, some churches spread it.

If you buy into this myth, you're not just wrong – you're part of a tradition of evil. It's time to grow up, read history properly, and toss the hate aside.

Now, for broader context: this myth doesn't exist in isolation – it's part of a web of antisemitic stereotypes. It links to the blood libel, accusing Jews of killing Christian children, because if they "killed Jesus," why not continue? It creates a vicious cycle of hate.

In the 20th century, antisemites like Julius Streicher used it in Der Stürmer, depicting Jews as demonic killers. This helped create the atmosphere leading to the Holocaust.

Scholars like Robert Wistrich in Antisemitism: The Longest Hatred explain how deicide formed the basis of Christian antisemitism. It wasn't just religious – it turned political. In 19th-century Russia, it justified pogroms. In 1903, in Kishinev, 49 Jews were killed after such accusations.

Thankfully, progress has been made. Many Protestant churches rejected it, and there's Jewish-Christian dialogue. But online, it resurfaces – QAnon mixes it with modern conspiracies.

To fight it, we need education – teaching real history, not myths.

Ultimately, this myth is a farce: ridiculous, but deadly. It shows how one lie can destroy lives. If you hear it, just say: "No thanks – I'll stick to facts."


Sources and Further Reading

Comments