Let’s talk honestly about the UN’s “humanitarian aid” over the past decade.
Not feelings. Numbers.
Sudan
Billions in aid over the years (roughly 8 to 14 billion).
And today over 20 million people are facing severe hunger. The state has collapsed so completely that no one can even count how many already died. Aid flowed in. Reality kept getting worse.
Yemen
Tens of billions in funding (about 20 to 28 billion).
Yet the war drags on for years and hunger remains catastrophic. Independent estimates suggest tens of thousands of children have died from starvation and malnutrition related disease.
How does that happen after so much money?
Gaza/Palestine
Hundreds of millions every year, adding up to roughly 10 to 20 billion through UN agencies including UNRWA.
And on the ground? Not reconstruction. Not functioning infrastructure. Instead cycles of destruction, armed groups, and a population still dependent on endless aid.
Iraq
6 to 12 billion in humanitarian funding.
Still struggling with instability, displacement, corruption and violence that never truly ended.
Nigeria
3 to 6 billion in aid.
Yet mass killings, terror attacks, displacement and chronic hunger continue. Entire regions remain unsafe despite a decade of “support”.
These are not small numbers. These are massive budgets from the US, EU, Germany, the UK, Japan, Canada, Scandinavia and many others.
And the simple question is this:
If the UN is managing such enormous funding, why do conditions on the ground barely improve?
The core issue isn’t whether people deserve help. Of course they do.
The issue is that the system has become slow, bureaucratic and often dependent on corrupt or armed local authorities who control territory. Money disappears into political machinery long before it reaches the people who actually need it.
So before pouring in more billions, maybe it’s time to ask:
Is the aid we’re giving changing anything - or just feeding a system that cannot fix what it was built to fix?
Comments
Post a Comment